Dinner scene

-
Blocking, traditional role Ben at the head of the table. Sets him up as the authoritative figure.

Everything is encouraging the spectator to align with the cash family due to the shots of the two girls' reactions.

Ben is seen as the person with agency within this dynamic. In this sense, there is a tendency towards passive spectatorship.

The scene with the video game noises is so oppositional to what the spectator has seen so far. The silent reaction of the Cash family, the spectator is made to question which family they would most align with. It provides a conflict of interest in the spectator's mind, and raises a lot of questions. The spectator is active because they are constantly torn whether or not they want to align with the Cash family or whether they feel isolated from them.


A dissodant counter ideology agains the status quo: The christian religion, capitalism / consumerism, /
- Character alignment
- Active /  passive spectatorship
- Link to US ideology

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Lychee Scene - Kevin

-
How useful has an ideological critical approach been in understanding the narrative resolution of your chosen films? (When looking at the films from a perspective of intense study, what can you find about the director's ideologies of feminism etc) Cinematography: -The scene begins with a shot of a reflection of Kevin eating in the glass table. There are two different ways that Kevin is seen by his parents. It is a reminder to the audience that Eva is reconfiguring the past. -Kevin is positioned centre frame, the audience's gaze is directed towards him, this reflects that Kevin's status and power is dominant over both of his parents. When Eva is in the Diner, she is on the edge of the frame, maybe because she is being separated from Kevin, this makes her an unbalanced person. There is a lot of dead space within the frame, isolating Eva in the present moment. Contrastingly, she is in the centre of the frame in the breakfast sequence which shows her strong similarit...
Read more

Milos Forman The Auteur and exam tips

-
-Auteur DEFINITION:  a [film director/actor etc.. but generally director] who influences their films so much that they rank as their author. Auteur theory, questions who the real writer and producer are in films, and insinuates that we should attribute authorship to a group of people Forman's signature features:        Casual informality of camera framing and angles, suggestive of documentary -        Seemingly spontaneous ‘candid (caught off guard, the opposite of set up intentionally or staged) camera’ style -        Social analysis – strong critiques of bureaucracy ( The Fireman’s Ball ) -        Allegory (symbolic narrative) or satire (mockery) strongly underpinned by ‘realism’ -        Earlier works made use of non-professional actors and semi-improvised dialogue to present a view of working...
Read more

dinner table scene captain fantastic

-
cinematography: shot so that the spectator can see from Ben's perspective. Handheld camera and shallow depth of field to pick out individual characters. Muted colour palette reflects the staid atmosphere of the scene. Ben sits at the end of the table in a place of authority. He has dominion over the situation. Comparative shots, between the two lifestyles with the cutaways to gage the reactions of the uncle and aunt. Lots of closeups and use of shallow depth of field. We align with the cash family. Costume differences between the families. Setting: characters being anomalous within the suburban setting. Proxemics within the frame At this point in the film we are aligned as a spectator with ben who is against the heart of US ideology. It attacks the education system in america. Dissident film:  a person who opposes official policy, especially that of an authoritarian state. The setting places a complete outsider into a literal representation of US ideology. The han...
Read more